<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[journalism - Politicolor]]></title><description><![CDATA[For the civic and curious]]></description><link>https://politicolor.com/</link><generator>Ghost 5.33</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:07:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://politicolor.com/tag/journalism/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Civic Life: A Modern Renaissance Man Shows Us How to Citizen]]></title><description><![CDATA[<!--kg-card-begin: html--><h2 class="graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote">If you can&#x2019;t find a job you love, make one up&#x2014;-<a href="https://www.facebook.com/BCSpeakerSeries/">Mo Rocca LIVE</a></h2>
<p class="graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote">&#x201C;As you get older, you care less what people think of you.&#x201D;</p>
<p class="graf--p">Some people break the mold and leave their mark on the world because it simply never occurred to</p>]]></description><link>https://politicolor.com/civic-life-a-modern-renaissance-man-shows-us-how-to-citizen/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">616f6d75d2ba8a19e20f443b</guid><category><![CDATA[Broward College Speaker Series]]></category><category><![CDATA[civic engagement]]></category><category><![CDATA[curiosity]]></category><category><![CDATA[good stories]]></category><category><![CDATA[human connection]]></category><category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category><category><![CDATA[Mo Rocca]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trish Everett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:48:42 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://politicolor.com/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-25-at-9.42.43-AM-1.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--kg-card-begin: html--><h2 class="graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote">If you can&#x2019;t find a job you love, make one up&#x2014;-<a href="https://www.facebook.com/BCSpeakerSeries/">Mo Rocca LIVE</a></h2>
<img src="https://politicolor.com/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-25-at-9.42.43-AM-1.png" alt="Civic Life: A Modern Renaissance Man Shows Us How to Citizen"><p class="graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote">&#x201C;As you get older, you care less what people think of you.&#x201D;</p>
<p class="graf--p">Some people break the mold and leave their mark on the world because it simply never occurred to them that it wasn&#x2019;t an option. Mo Rocca is just such an individual and I had the exquisite delight of getting to see him speak live.</p>
<p class="graf--p">From an early age, Rocca was aware of his affinity for media&#x200A;&#x2014;&#x200A;he was a television junkie, at least within the range his parents permitted. (Nothing so racy as <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">Dynasty</em> or <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">Dallas</em> for young Mo.) He consumed information and entertainment at every opportunity, even committing to memory the capitols of every nation while pouring over the World Book Encyclopedia. He can still rattle them off, even with geo-political updates. Just ask him. So with a mother encouraging him to make the most of his traditional education and a father escewing commonplace careers (and explicitly instructing him to avoid law school at all costs), Mo sought guidance elsewhere. Indicative of his &#x2018;blaze your own trail&#x2019; approach, when he encountered the film <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">The Killing Fields</em> as an adolescent, Rocca was clearly fascinated but couldn&#x2019;t choose a favorite topic. Did he envision himself as the photographer, in the thick of it covering breaking stories in a forgotten corner of the world? Or was he more interested in the artistic portrayal thereof? Turns out, he would make it his life&#x2019;s mission to embody the inherent tension between those two roles&#x200A;&#x2014;&#x200A;akin to &#x201C;going back to college and taking only electives.&#x201D;</p>
<div id="attachment_1803" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-24-at-3.22.31-PM.png" rel="attachment wp-att-1803"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1803" loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-1803" src="/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-24-at-3.22.31-PM-300x264.png" alt="Civic Life: A Modern Renaissance Man Shows Us How to Citizen" width="300" height="264" srcset="/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-24-at-3.22.31-PM-300x264.png 300w, /content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-24-at-3.22.31-PM.png 657w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px"></a><p id="caption-attachment-1803" class="wp-caption-text">Quite an impressive likeness. (Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/realestate/mo-rocca-at-home-in-greenwich-village.html?_r=0#" target="_blank">NYTimes</a>)</p></div>
<p class="graf--p">With an <a class="markup--anchor markup--p-anchor" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0733618/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1">impressively diverse resume</a>, Mr. Rocca has wowed any number of audiences, always bringing an undeniable sense of genuine interest and appreciation to his unique brand of humor. Whether playing dramatic roles on <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">General Hospital, The Good Wife, </em>and <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">Law &amp; Order</em> among others (a far cry from his humble beginnings as Dody in a traveling production of <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">Grease</em> that did the rounds of southeast Asia), or visiting the Republican National Convention to ask brazenly-candid questions of unwitting attendees, there is no doubt that the performance will be uniquely his own. He specializes in either authentic fiction or elaborative fact&#x200A;&#x2014;&#x200A;I can&#x2019;t decide which. But he brings his own flavor of humor to everything he touches, which may be why he is best known to many for his frequent appearances on what he calls &#x201C;the best job ever,&#x201D; NPR&#x2019;s <em class="markup--em markup--p-em">Wait, Wait, Don&#x2019;t Tell Me.</em> Improvisational and humorous takes on actual news stories? It&#x2019;s like they tailor made it just for him.</p>
<p class="graf--p">I admire Mr. Rocca for his unabashed selfless-selfishness. He knows that he performs best when he is fascinated, so he takes cues for his next career move based on a constant yearning to be fascinated. When faced with a crossroads, he asks himself, &#x201C;Am I still interested in what I am doing?&#x201D; From global capitols to long-forgotten presidential controversy, Mo has covered it all. He regaled us with the not-so-foreign tale of the opposition party claiming that a presidential candidate was ineligible for the White House due to the geographic location of his birth being in question along the US/Canada border. Ted Cruz? Try Chester A. Arthur. Following the trajectory of his fascinations can seem a rather frenetic exercise until you remember: &#x201C;I gravitate toward things where I can learn something.&#x201D;</p>
<p class="graf--p">So with all of his infinite wisdom, Rocca reflected a bit, opined a bit, and gave some great advice for life. He&#x2019;s played nearly every role in media that one can play, so when he suggests that it may be impossible for the 24 hour news machines to be neutral, I listen up. He points out the irony, that the original intention of the round-the-clock news channels was to have the luxury of digging deep into the issues. Instead, the rise of competition and the fall of the modern attention span have created a perfect storm of the same 8-minute long analysis on loop with a runner of headlines bearing all the nuance of a telegram. In fact, Rocca suggests that the weaknesses within the modern media machine have been best highlighted by none other than Mr. Donald J. Trump. Because the media has become so reliant on ratings, and they know that any words out of his mouth guarantee viewers, he is now the pied piper instead of being the target of focused analysis and interrogation. &#x201C;I&#x2019;ve never seen Sunday morning shows permit a <a class="markup--anchor markup--p-anchor" href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/chris-wallace-explains-why-he-wont-let-trump-call-in-to-fox-news-sunday/">call-in guest</a>.&#x201D; If you wanted your voice heard, you had to show up in person; now any whiff of a Trump appearance is sufficient, and the merest hint of a question about Ted Cruz&#x2019;s birthplace becomes a full-blown phenomenon.</p>
<div id="attachment_1787" style="width: 280px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1787" loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-1787" src="/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Mo-Rocca-4-270x300.png" alt="Civic Life: A Modern Renaissance Man Shows Us How to Citizen" width="270" height="300" srcset="/content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Mo-Rocca-4-270x300.png 270w, /content/images/wordpress/2016/01/Mo-Rocca-4.png 421w" sizes="(max-width: 270px) 100vw, 270px"><p id="caption-attachment-1787" class="wp-caption-text">Someone wrote in a question for the Q&amp;A, but Mo said he couldn&#x2019;t read the handwriting and asked the author to come to the stage and ask in person. The gentleman then made good use of an open mic. Check out the happy couple +1.</p></div>
<p class="graf--p">Mo Rocca loves a good story, and is willing to do what is necessary to help tell it. (He even took the opportunity to participate in a stealthy marriage proposal at our live event!) If there were ever someone to take advice from, I would think it would be the man who has written his own ticket in an industry that tends to chew up and spit out many who make it their calling. The keys to success, according to Mo, center around successful communication, no matter the particular persuasion of your ambition. At its core, he points out, communication is a human endeavor. Absolutely essential skills, particularly in this day and age of tech dependence, include the ability to listen, to WRITE, and to send a personal note for occasions of some import. &#x201C;I still cannot bring myself to send condolences for the loss of a loved one via email.&#x201D; Some things simply ought not be said in less than 140 characters or in a method that includes autocorrect. &#x201C;It is never too late to send a hand-written thank you note.&#x201D;</p>
<p class="graf--p">Perhaps that is Mr. Rocca&#x2019;s greatest gift is the essence of that human connection&#x200A;&#x2014;&#x200A;When given the chance to create his own show on Food Network, he opted to wander the country, meeting people&#x2019;s grandparents and learning their stories and cooking tips. &#x201C;I wanted to make a reality show with people you would actually want to be related to. I aimed to make a show that makes you want to be 80 years old.&#x201D; We have a wealth of knowledge in the older generations, and we need only tap it and actually listen. (Though, sadly, he spends so <a class="markup--anchor markup--p-anchor" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/realestate/mo-rocca-at-home-in-greenwich-village.html?_r=0">much time traveling</a> for his assorted projects that he has barely had time to test out the stunning recipes he has collected during his time interviewing octogenarians.)He noted that throughout his experience of interviewing everyone under the sun, he has learned one big lesson the hard way; we may think our work is done once the interviewer decides what to ask, but if I am not actively engaged and responsive to my subject, then I am doing them and the audience a disservice. This is remarkable evidence of the skill Rocca values above all others: Storytelling. &#x201C;The ability to write and tell a story&#x200A;&#x2014;&#x200A;beginning, middle, and end&#x200A;&#x2014;&#x200A;is invaluable.&#x201D; Those stories come in all shapes and sizes, from telling an epic tale to a decent joke. Regardless of quantity, there is no good reason to skimp on the quality.</p>
<p class="graf--p">So how did this event appear on a lineup of speakers on civic engagement? Mo left us with some serious words of wisdom: &#x201C;We can&#x2019;t move forward if we are afraid to look foolish. We need to rebrand &#x2018;FAIL&#x2019; as something not shameful.&#x201D; What stronger messages of everyday engagement could there be than to relentlessly pursue intellectual growth, human connection, betterment of self, and authentic communication? If man, like Aristotle says, is a political animal, then surely these are the most modern and existential elements of man&#x2019;s undeniable social nature and should be at the top of every active citizen&#x2019;s to-do list.</p>
<!--kg-card-end: html-->]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citizen's Conundrum: Dirt, Data and Digging Out]]></title><description><![CDATA[<!--kg-card-begin: html--><p>Now showing: &#x201C;every utterance, every court filing, every public transaction, every burp, every miscue.&#x201D;</p>
<p>In an interesting read, Jack Shafer wonders about the state of our politics &#x201C;<a title="Reuters blog: Now that we have dirt on everyone" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/" target="_blank">now that we have dirt on everyone</a>.&#x201D; While some <a title="Wired: Gladwell vs. Shirky: A year later, scoring the debate over social media revolutions" href="http://www.readability.com/read?url=http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/gladwell-vs-shirky/" target="_blank">debate the power of the Internet</a> to democratize even the</p>]]></description><link>https://politicolor.com/citizens-conundrum-dirt-data-digging-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">616f6d75d2ba8a19e20f4411</guid><category><![CDATA[Bernard K. Forscher]]></category><category><![CDATA[BROWN/Citizen]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chaos in the Brickyard]]></category><category><![CDATA[data]]></category><category><![CDATA[David Weinberger]]></category><category><![CDATA[elections]]></category><category><![CDATA[Jack Shafer]]></category><category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category><category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category><category><![CDATA[media]]></category><category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category><category><![CDATA[technology]]></category><category><![CDATA[Too Big to Know]]></category><category><![CDATA[WHOLENESS/order]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shellee O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:29:32 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--kg-card-begin: html--><p>Now showing: &#x201C;every utterance, every court filing, every public transaction, every burp, every miscue.&#x201D;</p>
<p>In an interesting read, Jack Shafer wonders about the state of our politics &#x201C;<a title="Reuters blog: Now that we have dirt on everyone" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/" target="_blank">now that we have dirt on everyone</a>.&#x201D; While some <a title="Wired: Gladwell vs. Shirky: A year later, scoring the debate over social media revolutions" href="http://www.readability.com/read?url=http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/gladwell-vs-shirky/" target="_blank">debate the power of the Internet</a> to democratize even the most authoritarian regimes, we should consider its role in making our politics dirtier than ever. Shafer describes the shift by comparing a campaign&#x2019;s opposition research to mining for gold:</p>
<blockquote><p>The past no longer matters to the political present the way it once did, because we have such better access to it today. Just 15 years ago, investigations of politicians and opposition research were largely limited to professionals with access to Lexis-Nexis or those who knew how to conduct a document search at the county courthouse. Digging dirt back then was like mining gold in the 1800s: labor intensive, and requiring both expertise and expensive tools. Widespread digitization and cheap information technologies haven&#x2019;t eliminated the professionals from political dirt digging, only lowered the barriers to entry.</p>
<p>Leaping over those low barriers this cycle is Andrew Kaczynski, a 22-year-old history major at St. John&#x2019;s University, who quarried C-SPAN archives for political gotchas and posted more than 160 of them on his<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/Akaczynski1?blend=1&amp;ob=video-mustangbase"> YouTube</a> channel, alerting the press to the best, he tells me.</p></blockquote>
<p>It isn&#x2019;t just the dirt. We&#x2019;re also awash in data or dirt masquerading as data. The information costs of a wold-be knowledgeable citizen are skyrocketing!</p>
<p>David Weinberger takes on this question from a scientific perspective in a book with a great title, <a title="On Amazon: Too Big to Know" href="http://www.amazon.com/Too-Big-Know-Rethinking-Everywhere/dp/0465021425/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_2" target="_blank"><em>Too Big to Know: </em></a><em>Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts Aren&#x2019;t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room is the Room</em>. He points to a scientist&#x2019;s lament from 1963. That scientist, Bernard K. Forscher, titled his famous letter &#x201C;Chaos in the Brickyard&#x201D; and complained that science was churning out too many bricks (facts) without the ability &#x201C;to complete a useful edifice because, as soon as the foundations were discernible, they were buried under an avalanche of random bricks.&#x201D; Weinberger explains the problem today is much larger than Forscher could have imagined. Our brickyards are networked!</p>
<p>He offers three reasons today&#x2019;s brickyards are galactic in scope and they&#x2019;re worth considering in the context of political dirt. I&#x2019;ll list them here but recommend visiting Weinberger&#x2019;s <a title="The Atlantic: To Know, but Not Understand" href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/to-know-but-not-understand-david-weinberger-on-science-and-big-data/250820/" target="_blank">post on The Atlantic</a> for a more detailed discussion.</p>
<ol>
<li>The economics of deletion. Little data is ever discarded now that massive amounts of storage are easy and<em><a href="/content/images/wordpress/2012/01/780979_f520.jpg"><img loading="lazy" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1002" title="780979_f520" src="/content/images/wordpress/2012/01/780979_f520-300x199.jpg" alt width="300" height="199"></a></em> inexpensive.</li>
<li>The economics of sharing. It&#x2019;s easier than ever to share everything. From the 160 hours of video on YouTube mentioned earlier to terabytes of data.</li>
<li>Computers are smarter. The processing power of the average desktop has increased exponentially.</li>
</ol>
<p>For science, this means the data grows more and more distant from hypothesis-testing and model-building. Data is made accessible in the hope that someone will eventually make it usable. For political life, this creates a chasm between news that matters and news that&#x2019;s entertaining. You want news you can use? Well, that&#x2019;s your problem.</p>
<p>It&#x2019;s easy to be overwhelmed while trying to sift through fact and fiction to find the information that makes a difference in vote choice, policy expectations or even the decision to get involved. If journalists once dug for gold to help their audiences navigate these turbulence, they&#x2019;ve sacrificed that role as they&#x2019;ve competed to throw bricks, to throw lots of them and to throw them before anyone else does.</p>
<p>A flurry of web activity demonstrates just how little help one can expect from the press. In a recent post to the New York Times Public Editor&#x2019;s Journal, Arthur Brisbane asked, &#x201C;<a title="NYT: Should the Times be a Truth Vigilante?" href="http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/should-the-times-be-a-truth-vigilante/?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">should the Times be a truth vigilante?</a>&#x201D;</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#x2019;m looking for reader input on whether and when New York Times news reporters should challenge &#x201C;facts&#x201D; that are asserted by newsmakers they write about.&#x201D;</p></blockquote>
<p>The earliest comments on the site hit along the same theme&#x2026; how could this even be a question? If the Times isn&#x2019;t a truth vigilante, what else could it be? Perhaps our media outlets have considered themselves to be purveyors of petty insults and meaningless drivel this whole time. Jay Rosen, a NYU journalism professor, has relentlessly called out the media for their &#x201C;view from nowhere&#x201D; and offers an <a title="Pressthink: So whaddaya Think" href="http://pressthink.org/2012/01/so-whaddaya-think-should-we-put-truthtelling-back-up-there-at-number-one/" target="_blank">excellent analysis </a>of this latest installment.</p>
<p>There are many reasons to expect this deluge of dirt and date to only get worse. I hope this all hits home the next time you see a headline lampooning what little information American voters know. Too many of us enjoy the chuckle and assure ourselves we&#x2019;re different. There&#x2019;s an important follow up questions we should require&#x2026; how the hell are we supposed to know anything? And what news are we missing because this headline was funny?</p>
<p>&#xA0;</p>
<p>*** A future post will look at how to ditch dumb headlines and demand better. If you have a strategy that works for you, please share it by commenting on this post.</p>
<!--kg-card-end: html-->]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>