<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[McCain - Politicolor]]></title><description><![CDATA[For the civic and curious]]></description><link>https://politicolor.com/</link><generator>Ghost 5.33</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 07:23:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://politicolor.com/tag/mccain/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Campaign 2008 in the Box]]></title><description><![CDATA[<!--kg-card-begin: html--><p>Sparking <a title="A collection of amazing blogs with one post" href="http://1post1der.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">curiosity</a> and provoking puzzled stares, Professor Harris proposed his model of <a title="Federalist Papers at FoundingFathers.org" href="http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/" target="_blank">Federalist</a> and <a title="Antifederalist Papers at Constitution.org" href="http://www.constitution.org/afp/afp.htm" target="_blank">Antifederalist </a>thinking provides a useful lens for understanding this year&#x2019;s presidential candidates. Those of us who want to draw a straight line to match today&#x2019;s political parties to the Federalist and Antifederalist</p>]]></description><link>https://politicolor.com/campaign-2008-in-the-box/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">616f6d75d2ba8a19e20f439d</guid><category><![CDATA[antifederalist]]></category><category><![CDATA[BLUE/Government]]></category><category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category><category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category><category><![CDATA[Federalist]]></category><category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category><category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category><category><![CDATA[RED/People]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shellee O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:23:43 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://politicolor.com/content/images/wordpress/2015/08/campaign-2008-in-the-box.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--kg-card-begin: html--><img src="https://politicolor.com/content/images/wordpress/2015/08/campaign-2008-in-the-box.jpg" alt="Campaign 2008 in the Box"><p>Sparking <a title="A collection of amazing blogs with one post" href="http://1post1der.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">curiosity</a> and provoking puzzled stares, Professor Harris proposed his model of <a title="Federalist Papers at FoundingFathers.org" href="http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/" target="_blank">Federalist</a> and <a title="Antifederalist Papers at Constitution.org" href="http://www.constitution.org/afp/afp.htm" target="_blank">Antifederalist </a>thinking provides a useful lens for understanding this year&#x2019;s presidential candidates. Those of us who want to draw a straight line to match today&#x2019;s political parties to the Federalist and Antifederalist perspectives were baffled. How in the world did Hillary end up in the same set of boxes as McCain and Bush?</p>
<p>The categories proposed for each candidate include&#x2026;</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Barack Obama</strong></span> is a <span style="color: #ff0000;">red box Federalist</span> driven by his understanding of us as a <span style="color: #ff0000;">people</span> committed to particular principles and one another.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Hillary Clinton</strong></span> is a <span style="color: #0000ff;">blue box Antifederalist</span> driven by a commitment to <span style="color: #0000ff;">government </span>and the solutions it should provide the people.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>J</strong><strong>ohn McCain</strong></span> is a <span style="color: #ff0000;">red box Antifederalist</span> driven by a belief in who we are as one <span style="color: #ff0000;">people <span style="color: #000000;">of a particular nation</span></span>.</p>
<p>And, another note of interest, <span style="color: #008000;"><strong>George W. Bush</strong></span> is a <span style="color: #003300;"><span style="color: #008000;">green box Antifederalist</span> </span>driven by a firm faith in <span style="color: #008000;">natural order</span>, what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil.</p></blockquote>
<p>Each of these explanations could benefit from additional elaboration. What I&#x2019;ve provided is simple and most definitely incomplete.</p>
<p>For example, it isn&#x2019;t that Hillary only sees government or the blue box but that her campaign was largely a matter of policy proposals. When she needed support for her proposals, she appealed to an understanding of who we are as a people or what we should understand about natural rights. The American people are fighters who believe health care is a universal right. The category distinction a matter of where each candidate is most likely to stake out their first position and then where they look for support.</p>
<p>When I saw this video of John McCain&#x2019;s new ad, I thought it spoke directly to the assertion that he is a red box Antifderealist. The conclusion and his purported slogan for the general election is the best: John McCain, putting country first.</p>
<p>If McCain is putting country first, he has red written all over him! Watch the video and consider what it says about who we are as a people and what we will do through government as a result.</p>
<p>[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O85jpuFKT4[/youtube]</p>
<p>If you find similar links to support or challenge the categories proposed for Clinton, Bush, and Obama, please post them in the comments!</p>
<!--kg-card-end: html-->]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>